Strengthening School Connectedness to Increase Student Success
Category: Student Well-Being and Mental Health
The MSCEIT tests the respondent's ability to perceive, use, understand, and regulate emotions. Using every-day life scenarios, the MSCEIT assesses how well an individual can react to and solve emotional problems as well as solve tasks. It was designed for use in corporate, educational, research, and therapeutic settings. Rather than a subjective assessment of one's own emotional intelligence, the MSCEIT uses a performance-based approach. There are many subscores reported in addition to total emotional intelligence (EIQ). These include two area scores for experiential EIQ and strategic EIQ. There are also branch scores of perceiving emotions, managing emotions, using emotions, and understanding emotions.
Content
Grades
12th Grade,
Post secondary
Languages
English
Spanish
Chinese
Other Language/s
German, French, Italian, Portuguese, Swedish, Danish, Finnish, Russian, Norwegian, Dutch, Czech, Turkish
Respondent
Student
Administration Information
Length
30-45 minutes
Qualifications
Must be certified through MHS assessments to purchase
Administration
Computer
Timed
No
Access and Use
Price
$55 per test
Contact
1 800 456 3003
Open Access
No
Use in Research
Cardoso, C., Ellenbogen, M. A., & Linnen, A. M. (2014). The effect of intranasal oxytocin on perceiving and understanding emotion on the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT). Emotion, 14(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034314
Day, A. L., & Carroll, S. A. (2004). Using an ability-based measure of emotional intelligence to predict individual performance, group performance, and group citizenship behaviours. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(6), 1443-1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00240-X
Kee, K. S., Horan, W. P., Salovey, P., Kern, R. S., Sergi, M. J., Fiske, A. P., Lee, J., Subotnik, K., Neuchterlein, K., Sugar, C. & Green, M. F. (2009). Emotional intelligence in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 107(1), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2008.08.016
Kong, D. T. (2014). Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT/MEIS) and overall, verbal, and nonverbal intelligence: Meta-analytic evidence and critical contingencies. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 171-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.028
Lanciano, T., & Curci, A. (2015). Does emotions communication ability affect psychological well-being? A study with the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) v2. 0. Health Communication, 30(11), 1112-1121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.921753
Psychometrics
Scoring
Computer scoring
Referencing
Norm-referenced
Psychometric References
Brannick, M. T., Wahi, M. M., & Goldin, S. B. (2011). Psychometrics of Mayer-Salovey-Caruso emotional intelligence test (MSCEIT) scores. Psychological Reports, 109(1), 327-337. https://doi.org/10.2466/03.04.PR0.109.4.327-337
Fiori, M., Antonietti, J. P., Mikolajczak, M., Luminet, O., Hansenne, M., & Rossier, J. (2014). What is the ability emotional intelligence test (MSCEIT) good for? An evaluation using item response theory. PloS one, 9(6), e98827. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098827
Maul, A. (2012). The validity of the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) as a measure of emotional intelligence. Emotion Review, 4(4), 394-402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912445811
Rossen, E., Kranzler, J. H., & Algina, J. (2008). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso emotional intelligence test V 2.0 (MSCEIT). Personality and Individual Differences, 44(5), 1258-1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.11.020
National Comparison
No
Item Type
Multiple choice
Likert
